Councils need more government support to tackle rogue landlords

The Guardian and ITV News recently uncovered how criminal landlords are exploiting legal loopholes to continue operating, even though they have been convicted and found not fit and proper. Licensing PRS properties has many advantages, however councils need more government support to ensure tenants are fully protected.

Metastreet have recently produced a report and key recommendation relating to PRS licensing for Core Cities UK. The report reviews licensing across England, Wales and Scotland and analyses the impact of selective licensing in our great cities. Finally, the report makes a number of recommendations for government. A summary of the recommendations can be found below:

  1. Return selective licensing powers to local authorities: Since April 2015, local authorities have had to seek approval from the Secretary of State for selective licensing schemes which would cover more than 20% of their geographical area or would affect more than 20% of privately rented homes in the area. The current application process places a significant burden on applying authorities: it is bureaucratic, subject to lengthy delays, and based on unclear, outdated criteria. While acknowledging a potential role for central government in quality-checking the operation of schemes, decisions to implement selective licensing should ultimately rest with local authorities, where there is a greater understanding of local need.
  2. Introduce a national landlord registration scheme: This could support and complement selective licensing schemes by making it easier for local authorities to identify landlords in their area. While this would not completely remove the need for data matching and other exercises to find unregistered landlords, it would help local authorities to build a much better picture of the PRS in their areas and reduce the resources needed to start a new scheme.
  3. Introduce stronger penalties for the very worst landlords and support local authorities to step up enforcement: While local authorities can currently issue civil penalties up to a maximum of £30,000, we support calls for higher financial penalties and property forfeiture in the worst cases. The government should also look at a new fund to support local authorities with initial investment to step up enforcement.
  4. Review and simplify existing regulation around licensing: While licensing is valued by many councils and residents, landlords and many councils also find current regulations bureaucratic and costly. While acknowledging the value of selective licensing, the government should seek to simplify regulations and processes where possible. For example, reducing the mandatory application questions landlords must answer.
  5. Update government guidance on fees, licensing conditions, and enforcement policy: the government could provide improved guidance to encourage greater standardisation in the operation of licensing schemes across the country, learning from existing best practice. Areas where guidance could be updated include:

    • Fees: Licensing fees vary significantly from scheme to scheme, and government should consider introducing clearer guidance on fees.
    • Licensing enforcement policy: There is significant variation in how licensing schemes are enforced. Government could create a more consistent approach by encouraging councils to adopt a national enforcement policy and publishing clear guidance.
    • Licensing conditions: The wording of licensing conditions varies outside of the mandatory conditions set by government. Government could consider introducing clearer guidance on what new licensing conditions can be set to help provide greater consistency.

A full copy of Metastreet’s PRS Licensing Research Report can be found here

Russell Moffatt

Russel Moffatt

Chartered EHP and Co-founder of Metastreet

5th November 2018

  • Copied!

Interested? Read our latest articles.

We use cookies on this site to enhance your on line experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

Cookie Policy

We use cookies to analyse our traffic. We strive to comply with the EU user consent requirements and we use reasonable effects to disclose clearly and obtain your consent to any data collection, storing, sharing and usage that takes place on this website.

How we use cookies

"Cookies" are small files which your web browser transfers to your computer when you visit a site. They are widely used in order to make websites work, or to work more efficiently, as well as providing information to the owners of the site.

Like many websites, we use cookies to help us monitor the use of the website. These cookies are used by Google Analytics so that we know when you've visited one page and then another. You can also read more information about the Google Analytics privacy policy.